<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan Moir and the Power of Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/</link>
	<description>A varied study of improperganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emile</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10843</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=8379#comment-10843</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone ever claimed that a trending topic on twitter was necessarily indicative of constructive debate.  Your critque of the jan moir twitter-storm therefore seems founded on an unrealistic interpretation of how twitter actually works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone ever claimed that a trending topic on twitter was necessarily indicative of constructive debate.  Your critque of the jan moir twitter-storm therefore seems founded on an unrealistic interpretation of how twitter actually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wicky</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10830</link>
		<dc:creator>wicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=8379#comment-10830</guid>
		<description>I have a slightly different angle (I&#039;m not sure if it meets Mark&#039;s required standard of constructive debate but it doesn&#039;t call for Moir to be crucified or whatever the baying mob are clamouring for).   One key problem is that, as Mark said, &#039;I am not sure that ... the Mail will change its modus operandi significantly&#039;.  Why?  Well, because the authorities (i.e. the Press Complaints Commission) are powerless.  That&#039;s not just my opinion ...  Journalism.co.uk predicts &#039;... Jan Moir and the Daily Mail will escape disciplinary action&#039; (http://www.journalism.co.uk/6/articles/536207.php).  They go to great lengths to explain why.  There may be a simper answer ... Cronyism ... Mr Paul Dacre, the chairman of the Press Complaints Commission&#039;s &#039;Code of Practice&#039; committee also has a day job as editor of ... the Daily Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a slightly different angle (I&#8217;m not sure if it meets Mark&#8217;s required standard of constructive debate but it doesn&#8217;t call for Moir to be crucified or whatever the baying mob are clamouring for).   One key problem is that, as Mark said, &#8216;I am not sure that &#8230; the Mail will change its modus operandi significantly&#8217;.  Why?  Well, because the authorities (i.e. the Press Complaints Commission) are powerless.  That&#8217;s not just my opinion &#8230;  Journalism.co.uk predicts &#8216;&#8230; Jan Moir and the Daily Mail will escape disciplinary action&#8217; (<a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/6/articles/536207.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalism.co.uk/6/articles/536207.php</a>).  They go to great lengths to explain why.  There may be a simper answer &#8230; Cronyism &#8230; Mr Paul Dacre, the chairman of the Press Complaints Commission&#8217;s &#8216;Code of Practice&#8217; committee also has a day job as editor of &#8230; the Daily Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun the sheep</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10829</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun the sheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=8379#comment-10829</guid>
		<description>Come on Mark, look at your own Moir oeuvre: a couple of rewtweeted links and jokes, just like the rest of us &#039;angry bleating herd&#039;. 

There&#039;s a time for reasoned, critical debate. And there&#039;s time for just adding your bleat. And we all, quite rightly, bleated. If you&#039;re uncomfortable with that, fine. But don&#039;t disingenuously point at &#039;them over there&#039;. You bleated too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Mark, look at your own Moir oeuvre: a couple of rewtweeted links and jokes, just like the rest of us &#8216;angry bleating herd&#8217;. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a time for reasoned, critical debate. And there&#8217;s time for just adding your bleat. And we all, quite rightly, bleated. If you&#8217;re uncomfortable with that, fine. But don&#8217;t disingenuously point at &#8216;them over there&#8217;. You bleated too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Richardjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10828</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Richardjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=8379#comment-10828</guid>
		<description>Jan moir. A strange, lonely and troubling columnist.
Not clever, not nice, and not interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan moir. A strange, lonely and troubling columnist.<br />
Not clever, not nice, and not interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/jan-moir-and-the-power-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=8379#comment-10827</guid>
		<description>Sadly, for most people, repeating what some celebrity they like has said is much easier (and therefore preferable) to actually working out and putting into words their own opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, for most people, repeating what some celebrity they like has said is much easier (and therefore preferable) to actually working out and putting into words their own opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

