<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journo gaffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/journo-gaffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/journo-gaffs/</link>
	<description>A varied study of improperganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/journo-gaffs/comment-page-1/#comment-10222</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=7328#comment-10222</guid>
		<description>Prior to today, the last time the BoE met to discuss whether interest rates should go up, down or stay the same, a well-known newspaper ran a story (online) immediately after the rate announcement detailing the BoE&#039;s decision to cut rates. 

The story included quotes of employees from the big financial institutions on why the government made the right decision: To help consumer confidence, lower property interest rates etc. 

Thing is though, the bank didn&#039;t cut interest rates at all. They kept them the same. But someone stupidly published the wrong pre-prepared story. 

By the time they took it down from the site they already had a number of comments by bemused readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to today, the last time the BoE met to discuss whether interest rates should go up, down or stay the same, a well-known newspaper ran a story (online) immediately after the rate announcement detailing the BoE&#8217;s decision to cut rates. </p>
<p>The story included quotes of employees from the big financial institutions on why the government made the right decision: To help consumer confidence, lower property interest rates etc. </p>
<p>Thing is though, the bank didn&#8217;t cut interest rates at all. They kept them the same. But someone stupidly published the wrong pre-prepared story. </p>
<p>By the time they took it down from the site they already had a number of comments by bemused readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

