<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ronnie O&#8217; Sullivan says snooker has gone to pot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/ronnie-o-sullivan-says-snooker-has-gone-to-pot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/ronnie-o-sullivan-says-snooker-has-gone-to-pot/</link>
	<description>A varied study of improperganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.markborkowski.co.uk/ronnie-o-sullivan-says-snooker-has-gone-to-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-10387</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markborkowski.com/?p=7893#comment-10387</guid>
		<description>Caught this yesterday Mark, and you can&#039;t really argue with Ronnie. Still, would be a shame if snooker was further marginalised, like bowls for instance.

A little niggle; why does everyone insist on refering to the &#039;85 final like it&#039;s the only one that took place? Yes, it was perhaps the pinnacle, certainly in viewer figures, but snooker has enjoyed many good years since.

Just a couple of comments on the Times&#039; list. There was a &#039;David Beckham of snooker&#039; in the shape of Paul Hunter, RIP, so perhaps they should have mentioned that. Agreed though, it needs a new one, quick.

Also. there is a female referee who takes charge of &#039;high-profile&#039; matches - Michaela Tabb - though she hasn&#039;t appeared in a mini-skirt, at least not to my knowledge.

I welcome all the Times&#039; suggestions though. Snooker desperately needs some razzmatazz if it ever hopes to compete with the noise. It&#039;s core viewers are (literally) dying out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caught this yesterday Mark, and you can&#8217;t really argue with Ronnie. Still, would be a shame if snooker was further marginalised, like bowls for instance.</p>
<p>A little niggle; why does everyone insist on refering to the &#8216;85 final like it&#8217;s the only one that took place? Yes, it was perhaps the pinnacle, certainly in viewer figures, but snooker has enjoyed many good years since.</p>
<p>Just a couple of comments on the Times&#8217; list. There was a &#8216;David Beckham of snooker&#8217; in the shape of Paul Hunter, RIP, so perhaps they should have mentioned that. Agreed though, it needs a new one, quick.</p>
<p>Also. there is a female referee who takes charge of &#8216;high-profile&#8217; matches &#8211; Michaela Tabb &#8211; though she hasn&#8217;t appeared in a mini-skirt, at least not to my knowledge.</p>
<p>I welcome all the Times&#8217; suggestions though. Snooker desperately needs some razzmatazz if it ever hopes to compete with the noise. It&#8217;s core viewers are (literally) dying out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

